3 ms·
They could deprecate the breaking changes - for example Python 2.8 could make print statements needlessly more awkward to write but warn instead of error and Py
by andy_ppp 10y ago
They could deprecate the breaking changes - for example Python 2.8 could make print statements needlessly more awkward to write but warn instead of error and Python 2.9/3.0 could make the changes permanent.
Rather than have this huge break maybe just take the time to move all of Python forward rather than us still 8 years after Python 3 leave us still talking about it.
- kstrauser 10y ago> They could deprecate the breaking changes - for example Python 2.8 could make print statements needlessly more awkward to write but warn instead of error Interesting. Now I want to make my own Python 2.8 which is 2.7.latest with the "-3" command line argument hardcoded to always be set.