> What about the embarrassing things other people post about John Doe? Is "John Doe" a politician trying to suppress public discourse about a scandal? If you

> What about the embarrassing things other people post about John Doe? Is "John Doe" a politician trying to suppress public discourse about a scandal? If you do something embarrassing, and people are talking about it, it is absolutely immoral to use government force to prevent people from disseminating information about it. > What if this harms his ability to provide for his family? Of course, think of the children. We must suppress any information that could negatively affect a hypothetical child!