2 ms·
> I'm not in the habit of accepting anything anyone says at face value. Well, that is generally a wise approach. The only reason I'm defending him is that I me
by charlesism 10y ago
> I'm not in the habit of accepting anything anyone says at face value.
Well, that is generally a wise approach. The only reason I'm defending him is that I mentally pegged him a long time ago as an unusually decent guy. To be fair, I only know him from his writings and public speaking, but that has been consistently developer-minded.
- morgante 10y agoI have met him and he is generally a very decent guy, but like I said his perspective is informed by specific experiences.
- fornever 10y agoThat is probably true, but then you also have to look at the merit of those experiences. His fight has essentially been trying to make programming a "respected profession", where you contributions and time is respected. If that's the environment you're trying to create, then side projects are less important. Since your best work, excitement and learning is supposed to happen at work. Side projects might even undermine your efforts since programmers at worse workplaces compensate by having more exciting side projects. So I think the perspective is less that side projects are bad and more that work should be good enough that side projects (that leads to commercial products rather than hobbies) become unnecessary.