Do you have any evidence of it being easy to influence the outcome of the election? As far as I can tell there are a ton more exploits to be had, from less pow

Do you have any evidence of it being easy to influence the outcome of the election? As far as I can tell there are a ton more exploits to be had, from less powerful (money, connections, etc.) people in an electronic system than in our current paper system. Right now the only individuals who have massive influence on an election are the candidates themselves (and maybe some specific people on their team). The next closest individuals are probably the extremely, extremely wealthy, and there aren't that many of them, and they don't even have as much power as you'd think.