3 ms·
Interviewers would have to spend a lot more time thinking up questions, so the cost-benefit analysis heavily discourages that. There's also the status-quo bias
by AngryParsley 16y ago
Interviewers would have to spend a lot more time thinking up questions, so the cost-benefit analysis heavily discourages that. There's also the status-quo bias to deal with.
I don't understand why people don't practice interviewing. It's worth your time to spend a few hours practicing something that could determine your future for years. Employers will change their interview process some day, but until then, if you want a good job you sometimes have to jump through stupid hoops.
Of course, I'd like interviewers to practice as well. When I interview someone, I want to get some idea of the candidate's skills. I seriously doubt my hastily-thought-up questions are anywhere close to optimal at achieving that goal.
- stretchwithme 16y agousually, they've got tough problems they need solved, so thinking up tough questions isn't really necessary send your best people to startup weekend and similar events. It should take only a few hours to identify the top people and establish a rapport that may lead to a successful hire.