4 ms·
That would actually be a convincing argument, if it weren't for the insurance coverage (private or government) they repeatedly mention. Seizing the person is j
by h4nkoslo 10y ago
That would actually be a convincing argument, if it weren't for the insurance coverage (private or government) they repeatedly mention. Seizing the person is just a prerequisite for getting the insurer to write the hospital a check; they're not the customer, they're the product.