5 ms·
If only the process of our life wasn't time-bound! There's so much to read that we can't help but look for signals, especially ones in an introduction which is
by arstin 10y ago
If only the process of our life wasn't time-bound! There's so much to read that we can't help but look for signals, especially ones in an introduction which is designed explicitly by the author to get people to continue reading the book and which takes as its subject the book as a whole.
It's not a matter of merely "not liking a sentence", it's that the author makes false or misleading claims to bolster his own standing (like the one quoted), fails to display a mastery of the relevant material, and gives enough clues in style and substance about the kind of book this is for me to know, from past experience, that it won't be my personal cup of tea.
What really matters:
I won't be reading this book given what I've seen so far, but I don't intend this as a general criticism.
Writing like this is essentially therapy and different people respond to different treatments. It may well be that for many science-y/CS folk this is just what the doctor ordered! And I have no interest in undermining that! And even if it is, to my sensibility, messy and lacking in the forceful individual style truly soul nourishing books require, it can still be valuable. Lord knows there are many books which I can rationally pick apart every which way or which just mouth one platitude after another, yet which truly moved me and made me a better person and of which I wouldn't change a thing.
- metaphorm 10y agoI think you might be very surprised if you read some of the author's other works then. good summary of his work is here: https://vividness.live/ https://vividness.live/ in particular he has written extensively about Buddhism and speaking personally I think he has a fascinating heterodox perspective on the subject.
- arstin 10y agoThanks. Perhaps. I'll check him out more. I do like people who try to pull together diverse threads. The black magic article seems kinda interesting. But my personal taste in "meaning of life" stuff these days is more the free spirit and cutting judgements of "The Education of Henry Adams" than a heavy-handed ology of meaningness. I'm suspicious of how tidy all his little categories are, how little self-awareness is exemplified (as opposed to mentioned), the seeming lack of humor despite being about a topic as complex and open as the living of life. Again this is just from a skim and I could change my opinion quickly.
- ivm 10y agoWhile I liked the attempts to test the teaching with modern rational thinking, there're some misunderstandings of the core concepts that resulted into article-sized straw man fights. The commentators pointed all of them out though.