3 ms·
For me, Racket is the sweet spot. It has a surprisingly good story for a lot of use cases, good included batteries, truly great documentation, static typing whe
by peatmoss 10y ago
For me, Racket is the sweet spot. It has a surprisingly good story for a lot of use cases, good included batteries, truly great documentation, static typing when you want it, the ability to make a redistributable native(-looking?) GUI app, better-than-python/ruby/other interpreted languages performance, etc.
I do like some of Clojure's syntactic sugaring, but I haven't yet decided whether it's worth it to me to use Rackjure (Clojure-isms ported to Racket).
- fbreduc 10y agoi always feel like racket just ultimately fails at self promotion