3 ms·
I think it's pointless. a) You'd have to keep this up and running forever. b) You are essentially trying to game a machine learning algorithm, which weights a
by WA 10y ago
I think it's pointless.
a) You'd have to keep this up and running forever.
b) You are essentially trying to game a machine learning algorithm, which weights and factors in so many signals, it's impossible to know. If you think you can game this system, SEO should be child's play for you.
c) Google probably has a profile of your personality already (such as the OCEAN model), because it can be derived from few signals such as a bunch of Facebook likes or whatever you type in the search slot. Because personality doesn't really change, your profile is set in stone for the future.
The only slight upside of this is: Google has to use this data about you, reach about to you or sell it to other people who reach out to you. To some extend, an ad blocker goes a long way, because then people can't target you specifically, despite having many information about you. But ultimately, you never know what kind of "content" is brought to you based on your personality and actions. Maybe it'd be even sane to assume that personal interaction with strangers could be motivated by means you don't understand.
- dvfjsdhgfv 10y agoa) The requirement of running it forever doesn't make it pointless. b) 1. Not knowing the outcome doesn't mean it's not worth trying. 2. It's not entirely true - SEO is about getting your phrase as close to the initial position as possible in an ecosystem with many contending players, whereas this is about introducing noise in your personal data. c) I beg to differ. When the signals change, why shouldn't the profile change?