3 ms·
And it is also why it will continue to be marginalised, and have generally shit, inconsistent UI.
by xorxornop 10y ago
And it is also why it will continue to be marginalised, and have generally shit, inconsistent UI.
- foepys 10y agoI feel that any KDE distribution has a more consistent UI than the monstrosity that is windows 10 with their Metro/Ribbon/Windows 7 UIs.
- andromeduck 10y agoconsistently bloated, yeah
- scythe 10y agoLol KDE has many flaws but bloat isn't one of them, I get the feeling sometimes that the presence of several ultra-ultra-light "desktop environments" on Linux causes people to think the major ones are "bloated" when in fact they're much smaller than the DEs on Windows/OS X. FWIW "slow under certain circumstances" does not necessarily imply bloat b/c a single badly implemented feature can cause slowness but that's not the same as bloat; try enabling compositing in some old versions of Xfce (basically right after it was added, maybe Xfce 4.2?) and you'll see what I mean real quick.
- krylon 10y agoIt is a matter of taste, of course, but compared to Windows 8 and Windows 10, common Linux/Unix desktop environments like MATE or Xfce are very pleasant to use.