3 ms·

I'm from Finlan ld but visting the US, till February and I have a feeling US will watch Belarus very closely to see if it is successful thrn will try to quietly

by Proof 10y ago

I'm from Finlan ld but visting the US, till February and I have a feeling US will watch Belarus very closely to see if it is successful thrn will try to quietly implement a ban or interfere with Tor as best as they can. Rule 41 is a mere Apptizer. The Americans have yet to receive their Entrés. What's even more scary is the radical laws being fought for in Canada as of today.

rblatz 10y ago
I doubt it, the US government invented and has been a major sponsor to the tor project. https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/ https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/
- whybroke 10y ago
  Historically yes. But I suggest bookmarking this comment and coming back to it in a few years to see how prophetic or absurd it turns out.
  - wruza 10y ago
    https://xkcd.com/628/ https://xkcd.com/628/
    - whybroke 10y ago
      Really? A cartoon about the Jeane Dixon fallacy is a response? I think you're going to find the next years very surprising indeed. Even now, using tor is de facto grounds for a wiretap[1] And I apologize in advance if my evidence is actually on topic and doesn't have funny pictures. [1]https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/05/section-702-mohamud-appeals-ruling/ https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/05/section-702-mohamud-appeal...
      - mSparks 10y ago
        back in the day, using a bbs was grounds for a wiretap. (The fact bbs were full of phreakers had absolutely nothing to do with it im sure....) so they sit, they listen, then do what exactly? Someone has to read through the material, decipher it, translate it, interpret it. and how exactly do you act on it? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10
- mSparks 10y ago
  its easy to see both the upside and downside of this though. its also only really a problem for americans. since the us government is paying to ensure other countries governments cant interfer with free communication. its a matter of opinion wether they also managed to gain the ability to interfere with free communication themselves. but since the "Next best alternative" is ssl/tls. kinda a moot point.
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]

by Proof 10y ago

rblatz 10y ago

I doubt it, the US government invented and has been a major sponsor to the tor project. https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/ https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/

whybroke 10y ago
Historically yes. But I suggest bookmarking this comment and coming back to it in a few years to see how prophetic or absurd it turns out.
- wruza 10y ago
  https://xkcd.com/628/ https://xkcd.com/628/
  - whybroke 10y ago
    Really? A cartoon about the Jeane Dixon fallacy is a response? I think you're going to find the next years very surprising indeed. Even now, using tor is de facto grounds for a wiretap[1] And I apologize in advance if my evidence is actually on topic and doesn't have funny pictures. [1]https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/05/section-702-mohamud-appeals-ruling/ https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/05/section-702-mohamud-appeal...
    - mSparks 10y ago
      back in the day, using a bbs was grounds for a wiretap. (The fact bbs were full of phreakers had absolutely nothing to do with it im sure....) so they sit, they listen, then do what exactly? Someone has to read through the material, decipher it, translate it, interpret it. and how exactly do you act on it? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10
mSparks 10y ago
its easy to see both the upside and downside of this though. its also only really a problem for americans. since the us government is paying to ensure other countries governments cant interfer with free communication. its a matter of opinion wether they also managed to gain the ability to interfere with free communication themselves. but since the "Next best alternative" is ssl/tls. kinda a moot point.
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]