> The article seems to imply that feature to feature they are matching the Hololens and that is the worst case scenario. But the article specifically says "as

> The article seems to imply that feature to feature they are matching the Hololens and that is the worst case scenario. But the article specifically says "as it stands now, is noticeably inferior to Microsoft’s HoloLens headset" So I don't get how matching Hololens is the "worst case scenario"