4 ms·
Technically this would be possible to overcome with a light field display. Light field displays are currently very far off from becoming commercially viable.
by code-monkey 10y ago
Technically this would be possible to overcome with a light field display. Light field displays are currently very far off from becoming commercially viable.
- chris_va 10y agoYou could approximate this using a standard display if you could dynamically track and respond to focal depth. That might be harder than getting a functional light field display, though.
- AstralStorm 10y agoMuch easier, we have the tech in ophthalmology and adaptive lenses that are used in cellphone cameras.
- chris_va 10y agoOut of curiosity, what would the tech stack look like? What I was picturing was: - LCD display - Patterned IR image projected onto eye - Camera to read IR image on the back of retina, to figure out current focal length of cornea - Realtime chip to adjust LCD display based on focal depth, to simulate light field image. ... The real issue is that response latency would have to be <10ms probably to avoid being disorienting.
- zardo 10y agoWell, wether to product is viable or not, that's what Magic Leap is trying to deliver.