So every "language" basically becomes a "hub" language, with lots of sub-componenent syntaxes, dedicated to a specific task. Functional programming would be the

So every "language" basically becomes a "hub" language, with lots of sub-componenent syntaxes, dedicated to a specific task. Functional programming would be the future of all "Hub" programming, if it were not for the performance costs. The "language" a project is written in, boils down to the percentages one or several of the tools of the swiss-army-knife Hub language are used- or even subverting (as in replacing) another language. You could create a sort of functional-programming-tool in assembler - if your project is performance thirsty. So i guess the next step is to allow architects to limit certain language features to prevent architectural decay. Templated Packages that adapt the language percentage of reused Components to the projects needs?