3 ms·
>How many successful companies do the exact opposite of Google? Have you done any research to determine which company succeeded: in spite of, because of, or no
by htrp 10y ago
>How many successful companies do the exact opposite of Google? Have you done any research to determine which company succeeded: in spite of, because of, or no effect, from these models? What about the - surely - hundreds or thousands of companies that failed with Google (or not Google's) model?
Do you know of any examples offhand? Definitely agree that it's a virtuous cycle of talent -> revenue - > perks -> talent
>Trying to imitate success seems to turn into a cargo cult.
Love the apt description of this.
- sien 10y agoThe model of trying to land smart people with perks like kitchens, foosball tables, Aeron chairs and all the rest and hope that they come up with something that makes lots of money was what many companies tried in the first Dot Com boom. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble#Free_spending https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble#Free_spending Offhand examples are the list of failed companies on that page.