3 ms·
I think there will always be resistance to change, so perhaps there should be a visible indication that some idea is being tested out, with an option for users
by qwename 10y ago
I think there will always be resistance to change, so perhaps there should be a visible indication that some idea is being tested out, with an option for users to disable it.
- dang 10y agoThat works for software changes but not community standards, which is what we were experimenting with here. Perhaps the lesson is simply: don't experiment with community standards.
- nitrogen 10y agoI'd hope that at least some experimentation is still possible. Wouldn't a lack thereof lead to stagnation? I have a hard time believing that, as great as it is, HN has found the global maximum of community design.
- qwename 10y agoI mistakenly thought of the change as a software change, since I've yet to use the flag button. It might be useful to tie changes in community standards to something concrete and trackable. Taking the detox week as an example, there would be a way to flag something and specify "detox week" as a reason. That being said, can you give an example of changes in community standards on this site which effects cannot be tracked in software? EDIT: Clarified scope of "changes in community standards" to this site.
- dang 10y ago> Can you give an example of changes in community standards on this site which effects cannot be tracked in software? Story quality, thread quality, community satisfaction...
- dredmorbius 10y agoExperiment, please, but wisely and with clear communications. The 'Net needs more models tested, but also far more nuance than most sites seem to show.