4 ms·
Ironic that we're reading this article from a bastion of "pay for high quality" and such is the quality we receive.
by DrSprout 16y ago
Ironic that we're reading this article from a bastion of "pay for high quality" and such is the quality we receive.
- nudge 16y agoSeriously, what would you have preferred? "AOL, a web portal which was recently spun off from Time Warner, a media giant, but which a decade ago actually bought Time Warner." Is that better? Does it make any difference?
- Vivtek 16y agoSeriously? Either assume that thinking people who have an interest in business already know what AOL is (instead of implying that there is mysteriously an adult businessperson who has never heard of AOL), or in your definition of "AOL", give a concise summary of its history with a time horizon greater than three years. The sentence that was actually included was jarring in its isolation from reality, and that's not really what you expect from the Economist.