3 ms·
Marc's point about the governance requirement being moot because the government would require Zuck to give up his position in FB anyway is particularly poignant
by relaunched 10y ago
Marc's point about the governance requirement being moot because the government would require Zuck to give up his position in FB anyway is particularly poignant now. The government certainly hasn't figured out what to do with PE Trump and his business interests, nor the interests of the other billionaires he's appointing to key positions.
- knorby 10y agoTrump is also unique from pretty much anyone else in government with regard to conflict of interest law, as is part of the discussion now. Given the term mentioned was two years for Zuck, he couldn't be president and remain in control of Facebook.