In the article one of the main points is protecting Zuckerberg's long term control, in the event that he "spent 2 years in government". If that's not telegraph

In the article one of the main points is protecting Zuckerberg's long term control, in the event that he "spent 2 years in government". If that's not telegraphing intent, I don't know what is. So it appears pretty clear that there's a bigger career game being played here, and it isn't even strictly about stock.