2 ms·
Sqldf is very tempting, but at least in the past it was so much, much slower than dplyr that the time to learn dplyr's syntax could pay off in a single project,
by rz2k 10y ago
Sqldf is very tempting, but at least in the past it was so much, much slower than dplyr that the time to learn dplyr's syntax could pay off in a single project, or possibly even a single large operation.