>The 6502's two-phase clock throws a wrench in direct clock speed comparisons, no? Not really? The two phases are more or less just inverted versions of each o

>The 6502's two-phase clock throws a wrench in direct clock speed comparisons, no? Not really? The two phases are more or less just inverted versions of each other[1], but 1 clock cycle, for the purposes of counting cycles-per-instruction, is the same time (I think) whether you're measuring phase-1-high to phase-1-high or phase-2-low to phase-2-low. [1]http://lateblt.livejournal.com/88105.html http://lateblt.livejournal.com/88105.html