3 ms·
Yes, precisely. I prefer to not be one of those folks who states her own personal biases and assumptions as though they were Universal Truths. There are quite e
by adrienne 10y ago
Yes, precisely. I prefer to not be one of those folks who states her own personal biases and assumptions as though they were Universal Truths. There are quite enough of them around here already.
- digler999 10y agoYou're a deeply unhappy person. And it's clear by the number of times you invoke yourself into a discussion that has nothing to do with you.
- grzm 10y agoa discussion that has nothing to do with you. I'm genuinely confused. The particular thread you commented on includes 'ubernostrum, 'dang, 'adrienne, and 'tptacek, and references discussions elsewhere that includes 'ubernostrum and 'adrienne. That seems to have a lot to do with 'adrienne. So, the first person references indicate that 'adrienne's deeply unhappy, that seems like a serious reach. Do you have references for this? I'm interested in how people express themselves, and would like to learn more about it. Also, where are you going with this conversation? If you're only going to continue by references to 'adrienne as a person rather than some topic of discussion, this isn't really going to be particularly useful. If you don't have anything civil or substantive to contribute, what's the motivation for continuing to comment?
- dang 10y agoWhat you posted upthread was bad enough, but this is an outright personal attack. Those are not allowed here and will get your account banned, so please don't do this again.