4 ms·
The difficulty with this (and any other sites it resembles - quibids, for example) is that there is absolutely no good reason to believe that there aren't bots
by jat850 17y ago
The difficulty with this (and any other sites it resembles - quibids, for example) is that there is absolutely no good reason to believe that there aren't bots behind the scenes driving up the bids.
As an exercise in curiosity one day I watched a few auctions on quibids for about 45 minutes - with a number of them, immediately after a bid was placed by what may have been a "real" user, nearly instantly another user - always the same one - placed another bid.
After a time watching this, I began counting the number of bids placed (at 60 cents per bid, which is quibids rate), the questionable bidder placed over 300 bids in the span of 45 minutes - each time in immediate response to someone else's bid.
The item in question was a $100 gift card from Target. At 300 bids (60 cents each), that was $180.00 - grossly in excess of the value of the card itself.
Yes, it could be claimed that this was just a very dumb bidder, but the speed and rate at which they were entering bids was nearly unbelievable.
The auction ended at $15.40. At one cent increments, that was 1540 bids - at 60 cents each. Quibids made 924 + 15.40 - $100 for that card. Sick.
- clavalle 17y agoThere is no reason to think that the bots are from the site itself (though, no reason to think they are not, either). It seems to me that it would be almost trivial to bot this up...but then you have a bot war trying to get the last possible profitable bid -- or at least one that the bot programmer is comfortable with.
- mikeklaas 17y agoYes there is good reason to think that. An outsider would have to pay .75c/bid to run the bot, which is lunacy. A bot run by wavee would pay nothing