5 ms·
A response to Josh Korr’s post on the argument for Progressive Enhancement
- lojack 10y agoDo people really use PEer as an actual term? I thought the term progressive enhancement was something used by technically minded folks to convey a concept. Never in a million years would I see it turned into a political term used for stupid binary arguments. To be honest, I couldn't make it through either article. The fact that we're even having this discussion scares me, this article is at least reasonable, albeit a bit unnecessary. We get it. Progressive enhancement is a good thing. Sometimes, for a variety of reasons you can't have it -- that's ok. I don't think any reasonable person would ever argue that we should never have progressive enhancement, and I don't think any reasonable person would ever argue we should always have progressive enhancement.