2 ms·
Its weird how far java has fallen behind C# (especially given that C# was, to put it kindly, originally just basically "microsoft java".) It would seem like Or
by overgard 10y ago
Its weird how far java has fallen behind C# (especially given that C# was, to put it kindly, originally just basically "microsoft java".) It would seem like Oracle could just follow the blueprint, so I'm sort of surprised they haven't
- jpitz 10y agoThe falling-behind happened early, and fast. MS took full advantage of second-mover status to change fast and add features. They also targeted fewer platforms initially. While the market niche was certainly aimed squarely at the same demographic as Java users, the language owes as least as much to Borland Object Pascal as it does to Java. Speaking of Object Pascal, MS also got Anders Hejlsburg to design it. Oracle/Sun, stuck with a huge, conservative enterprise user base, was shackled by backwards compatibility. In hindsight, I don't think it weird that Java fell behind the way it did.
- douche 10y agoThere was a huge gap of time where effectively there was no forward progress with Java. I learned Java 6 in high school - by the time I graduated college Java 7 still hadn't been released.