3 ms·
On the other hand maybe people will choose not to use the overhead bin now that it costs money. Wouldn't that save some time?
by saint_fiasco 10y ago
On the other hand maybe people will choose not to use the overhead bin now that it costs money. Wouldn't that save some time?
- draw_down 10y agoThat could happen, but I doubt it because the alternative is checking bags which also costs money and takes more time.
- dagw 10y agoIsn't the alternative to keep your bag under the seat in front of you?
- draw_down 10y agoMost people use both spaces, I'd say. You can't fit much more than a bookbag under the seat
- dagw 10y agoSure, but I imagine that many of the people skipping the overhead locker are people who are only bringing a small bag
- ptaipale 10y agoUmm, in my experience, you can almost always fit the standard cabin class bag under the seat in front of you. (55x40x25 cm, or 22x16x10 inches) Of course, I still rather put the bag in the overhead compartment, because then there is more legroom. Or some legroom, to be precise. If the bag fills up the space in front of you, it's quite inconvenient.