3 ms·
Thanks. It's been too long since I've studied statistics. Might be time to watch some khan academy. Oh, I see. Assuming probability that a man is not colorb
by DigitalJack 10y ago
Thanks. It's been too long since I've studied statistics. Might be time to watch some khan academy.
Oh, I see. Assuming probability that a man is not colorblind is 0.9, then you found the probability of none of them being colorblind and subtracted that amount from 1 to find the other side.
For anyone reading this that was bothered by my use of a specific gender, it's because colorblindness occurrence is significantly higher in men than women.
- intransigent 10y agoAn ever-apologetic, yet demanding complainer. The entire world should bend to your will, and court your color blind deficiency, and yet you curtsy to the possible perception of a non-neutral, gender-specific rant. Honestly. Who fucking cares? Just say your piece, and dispose of the chivalry, since it too is technically sexist. Wallow in the reality that someone will be annoyed by such pretentiousness. Meanwhile, color coding can use HSB models to still permit differentiability via brightness contrast, and font weight, when coding. It's not like us color coders are ignoramuses, you insensitive clod!