3 ms·
Story broke 6 hours ago: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-is-finally-going-to-start-publishing-its-artificial-intelligence-research-2016-12?r=UK&IR=T http:
by melling 10y ago
Story broke 6 hours ago:
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-is-finally-going-to-start-publishing-its-artificial-intelligence-research-2016-12?r=UK&IR=T http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-is-finally-going-to-sta...
Mac site picks it up 5 hours ago and it gets reported on HN:
https://9to5mac.com/2016/12/06/apple-ai-researchers-can-publish/ https://9to5mac.com/2016/12/06/apple-ai-researchers-can-publ...
Bloomberg writes the same story an hour ago and it finally gets huge traction on HN. My guess is that many people ignore the "new" page and it's all a matter of luck that 3 or 4 people get it to the front page where a story takes off.
- JamilD 10y agoBusinessInsider and Mac blogs tend to be less reputable sources than Bloomberg, whose articles regularly make it to the HN front page. Might have contributed to this particular submission's success.