2 ms·
First, I really appreciate the reply. So, thank you. It may seem a rehash (and, it partially is). But, there are readers who are either unaware or have forgot
by ap22213 10y ago
First, I really appreciate the reply. So, thank you.
It may seem a rehash (and, it partially is). But, there are readers who are either unaware or have forgotten that Google doesn't give away services for free. Google is an advertisement and tracking company, not a benevolent technology supplier.
The Google collective is obviously way smarter than any of us. So, who really knows how they plan to profit from this service. My guess: It gives them further reach beyond Android devices. It requires people who may otherwise quickly turn off location services to keep it on. And, it allows them to bypass COPPA via implied parental consent.
Look, I've worked in this industry. And, tracking devices (AKA people) is massively profitable. And, the profit increases exponentially. That is, the profit per signal increases as the number of signals and devices grows. Furthermore, at the highest levels of coverage density, it becomes possible to even make accurate conclusions from the empty spaces (i.e. people without devices).
- pgeorgi 10y agoMy (totally scientifically unfounded) suspicion is that people who decide to turn off Location Services also won't install this app (or will enable the app selectively, if they use LS that way so far)