4 ms·
Hi patates. I get your point. As a user, I'd want that too. I had previously priced the professional license at $149 as a one-off price, but then noticed compan
by anakic 10y ago
Hi patates. I get your point. As a user, I'd want that too. I had previously priced the professional license at $149 as a one-off price, but then noticed companies were buying those instead of the enterprise ones, and getting unlimited licenses. I'd definitely like to keep the subscription model for enterprise licenses, but would not mind having the private ones be a one-off price. I'll have to think about that. If I do that at some point, I'll change the existing licenses to permanent, to not be a jerk to existing customers:)
- eitland 10y agoJetBrains which creates IntelliJ etc is nice this way, they give you a permanent license to the last version released while you were still a customer (provided you are a customer for more than x months first.) I find this both smart and nice: you can pay monthly and still get a permanent license so you won't be trapped. Full disclosure: I use Netbeans which is free from the start and which I like better anyway, I'm just saying Jetbrains seems to be a nice company ;-)
- anakic 10y agoYeah, something like that might be the way to do it. Cut off old licenses from new versions but leave it functioning indefinitely with old versions. Offer a paid upgrade option. I think I like that option.
- seanp2k2 10y agoAlways seemed like a fair system to me as well. You're paying for a year of updates, then after that it'll continue to work and receive security-critical updates, but you won't get the new features. Of course, it's possible to totally plan features out over the years to encourage people to upgrade, or e.g. Hold back something many have wanted in order to release it with the next big version where people would get cut off, but alas.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]