4 ms·
> distribution of that farm product to a far away base of consumers is not viable Can you source this? My understanding of academic research in this area was t
by jakewins 10y ago
> distribution of that farm product to a far away base of consumers is not viable
Can you source this? My understanding of academic research in this area was that the energy used for artificial lighting by far outweighs the energy used for production and transportation for conventional produce.
Eg: If you're interested in climate impact or energy use, warehouse farms burn significantly more coal to keep the lights on, and the divide can be expected to expand as LED efficiency is already extremely high, while there are gains every year in lowering the energy usage in transportation.
Cornell Dept. of Horticulture has a good video on this here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrpyUA1pQqE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrpyUA1pQqE
- odbol_ 10y agoWho said they needed to exclusively use artificial lighting? They do have the sun over there, right?
- jakewins 10y agoWell, the original article was about growing inside a warehouse - hence no sun. They could ofc use green houses. However, if you've ever seen a modern industrial green house after dark, you can see how they would be unlikely to get a permit for a large operation. The light pollution from these things can be seen lighting the sky above them from miles away, they are like miniature suns. Imagine having one outside your apartment :)