3 ms·

> Someone else in this thread commented that the repo linked in the article isn't the right one and apparently this is where the code resides https://github.com

> Someone else in this thread commented that the repo linked in the article isn't the right one and apparently this is where the code resides https://github.com/commaai/openpilot https://github.com/commaai/openpilot Hmm. Sorry, but no. I am not going to let my car being driven by dynamically typed code without any tests. Frankly, it looks like a hobby project that has grown a bit messy over time.

undersuit 10y ago
>I am not going to let my car being driven by dynamically typed code without any tests. How are you going to enforce that? Make Tesla show you their source? How are you not already enforcing that? Make the existing automobile makers show their source for the plethora of computer driven systems!
- tdb7893 10y ago
  Even if they don't show unit tests they will at least have done a ton of manual testing and a bunch of tests for regulators. This has none of that.
  - undersuit 10y ago
    >they will at least have done a ton of manual testing That is a very quantifiable amount that I totally understand. >bunch of tests for regulators Oh and how many of our emissions testings have been gamed by at least one company?
    - tdb7893 10y ago
      In this case no one has verified it and it is obviously kind of a shoddy product (e.g. it has no unit tests) so I won't be satisfied until there has been some testing on it. I don't have a very specific amount that it needs to be tested and any number I put on it would be completely arbitrary anyway. Overall I trust regulators, the problem was the company specifically dodging regulations and it was in a way that wasn't apparent to the consumer so this is a different prospect and any issues would be immediately apparent to end consumers. This would make it so if you tried to game the system people would figure out pretty quickly.

3 ms·

> Someone else in this thread commented that the repo linked in the article isn't the right one and apparently this is where the code resides https://github.com

by tomtomtom777 10y ago

undersuit 10y ago
>I am not going to let my car being driven by dynamically typed code without any tests. How are you going to enforce that? Make Tesla show you their source? How are you not already enforcing that? Make the existing automobile makers show their source for the plethora of computer driven systems!
- tdb7893 10y ago
  Even if they don't show unit tests they will at least have done a ton of manual testing and a bunch of tests for regulators. This has none of that.
  - undersuit 10y ago
    >they will at least have done a ton of manual testing That is a very quantifiable amount that I totally understand. >bunch of tests for regulators Oh and how many of our emissions testings have been gamed by at least one company?
    - tdb7893 10y ago
      In this case no one has verified it and it is obviously kind of a shoddy product (e.g. it has no unit tests) so I won't be satisfied until there has been some testing on it. I don't have a very specific amount that it needs to be tested and any number I put on it would be completely arbitrary anyway. Overall I trust regulators, the problem was the company specifically dodging regulations and it was in a way that wasn't apparent to the consumer so this is a different prospect and any issues would be immediately apparent to end consumers. This would make it so if you tried to game the system people would figure out pretty quickly.