4 ms·
> 3% to 3.3% or 3.6% in 50-60 years - is that statistically significant? Since all births are recorded, the sample size is very large. So without having the n
by Noseshine 10y ago
> 3% to 3.3% or 3.6% in 50-60 years - is that statistically significant?
Since all births are recorded, the sample size is very large. So without having the numbers and doing any calculations, just based on that I'm pretty sure even a much smaller increase would still be statistically significant.