3 ms·
In my 20s I regularly did 80 hour weeks. In my 30s it was probably 60 hour weeks, but I once did six back-to-back 100+ hour weeks to ship a feature. Took me a
by kabdib 10y ago
In my 20s I regularly did 80 hour weeks.
In my 30s it was probably 60 hour weeks, but I once did six back-to-back 100+ hour weeks to ship a feature. Took me a few months to recover from that.
When I was in my late 40s I did a three-week reprise of those back-to-back 100+ hour weeks, and again it took me months to recover. I escaped that particular group just ahead of a year+ death march that I probably would just have quit in the middle of.
Sure, you can crunch. There is a cost. I probably would have been a lot happier not working so much, but honestly I didn't know how.
It's still easy to get sucked in, but I'm both too wise and too old to do heavy crunch hours, though I will happily spend the odd few late nights getting something out the door.
- edblarney 10y agoAgreed. Past 35 there is quite a noticeable recovery period. Also - I find it's not the actual work ... it's the stress and the relentless nature of it. 100 feels like watching 3 toddlers every waking moment of the day.