3 ms·

So, now you divulge that your spouse's family has ties of dependency to Wal-Mart (what kind of retirement plan does Wal-Mart give after 30 years?). And you adm

So, now you divulge that your spouse's family has ties of dependency to Wal-Mart (what kind of retirement plan does Wal-Mart give after 30 years?). And you admit that Wal-mart as a topic is something that held your interest for years, so you're not exactly unbiased when you're asking for evidence, which explains why you were so quick to discount all evidence provided with such hand-wavey statements as "it was settled out of court without admission of fault", as if that meant something. And despite your own personal injuries caused by their policies, you like the company enough to not bother with financial recompensation you are entitled to. Keep pretending that your "debunking" posts didn't lead to the burning of my karma, and people downvoting my posting history. I'm now curious about how far it can go!

LyndsySimon 10y ago
> So, now you divulge that your spouse's family has ties of dependency to Wal-Mart (what kind of retirement plan does Wal-Mart give after 30 years?). I'm not privy to my father-in-law's financial details, and if I was, I wouldn't share them with strangers online. This is exactly what I mean by "personal attack". You're attempting to discredit me instead of addressing my argument. > And you admit that Wal-mart as a topic is something that held your interest for years, so you're not exactly unbiased when you're asking for evidence, which explains why you were so quick to discount all evidence provided with such hand-wavey statements as "it was settled out of court without admission of fault", as if that meant something. I never claimed to be unbiased, I asked you to provide sources for claims. The fact that "it was settled out of court without admission of fault" doesn't mean anything is exactly my point. It does not support your position. > And despite your own personal injuries caused by their policies, you like the company enough to not bother with financial recompensation you are entitled to. Who said I liked WalMart? I have several issues with them, mostly around how they treat their suppliers. I didn't sue them because it would have cost me a lot of money with very little chance of success. > Keep pretending that your "debunking" posts didn't lead to the burning of my karma, and people downvoting my posting history. I'm now curious about how far it can go! My posts have nothing to do with people downvoting you. Your attitude and refusal to support your claims are responsible for that.
- anonbanker 10y ago
  Grey posts look good on you. Have a nice week!

LyndsySimon 10y ago

> So, now you divulge that your spouse's family has ties of dependency to Wal-Mart (what kind of retirement plan does Wal-Mart give after 30 years?). I'm not privy to my father-in-law's financial details, and if I was, I wouldn't share them with strangers online. This is exactly what I mean by "personal attack". You're attempting to discredit me instead of addressing my argument. > And you admit that Wal-mart as a topic is something that held your interest for years, so you're not exactly unbiased when you're asking for evidence, which explains why you were so quick to discount all evidence provided with such hand-wavey statements as "it was settled out of court without admission of fault", as if that meant something. I never claimed to be unbiased, I asked you to provide sources for claims. The fact that "it was settled out of court without admission of fault" doesn't mean anything is exactly my point. It does not support your position. > And despite your own personal injuries caused by their policies, you like the company enough to not bother with financial recompensation you are entitled to. Who said I liked WalMart? I have several issues with them, mostly around how they treat their suppliers. I didn't sue them because it would have cost me a lot of money with very little chance of success. > Keep pretending that your "debunking" posts didn't lead to the burning of my karma, and people downvoting my posting history. I'm now curious about how far it can go! My posts have nothing to do with people downvoting you. Your attitude and refusal to support your claims are responsible for that.

anonbanker 10y ago
Grey posts look good on you. Have a nice week!