4 ms·
It comes off as weird because he claims to see a connection that I don't. As I mentioned, there is no concept of "revolutionary language" in Soviet or general M
by resfirestar 10y ago
It comes off as weird because he claims to see a connection that I don't. As I mentioned, there is no concept of "revolutionary language" in Soviet or general Marxist thought. The connection to pronouns rests on that being a real thing, so there's nothing left to help me see why social justice-themed legislation has anything to do with Marxism in his mind.
- Chris2048 10y agoDo you mean you don't see it in this interview, or in Petersons' work in general? "revolutionary language" possibly means soviet language reform?: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=stqV47DuteoC&pg=PA103 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=stqV47DuteoC&pg=PA103