4 ms·
Any kind of pay break would be abused to no end by employers. Not to mention that one still needs to pay bills and live while in the apprenticeship, and minimu
by st3v3r 10y ago
Any kind of pay break would be abused to no end by employers.
Not to mention that one still needs to pay bills and live while in the apprenticeship, and minimum wage already doesn't cover that. So you'd be in a situation where only those who already have money would be able to afford to do it, much like unpaid internships. This leaves lower income people worse off than they were.
- snrplfth 10y agoWhat I'm saying is that, if you insist that monetary compensation for a particular job must be no less than a certain amount, then all other benefits (insurance, training, experience) will be limited by that. A job that does not confer many added skills or valuable experience may therefore be available for that wage, but one where much of the compensation is training may not be available at that wage price. It's not a case of "apprentices making more money" vs. "apprentices making less money". It's a case of "apprentices making less money" vs. "apprentices not hired at all."
- st3v3r 10y agoAt the same time, business has proven time and again that they cannot be trusted with things like this. So some other way needs to emerge.