3 ms·
"Social experience at <x> feels contrived and not everyone may want it." This pretty much sums up _everything_. So, why do we even try to have societies? Edit
by JustSomeNobody 10y ago
"Social experience at <x> feels contrived and not everyone may want it."
This pretty much sums up _everything_. So, why do we even try to have societies?
Edit: You use an example of going to a bar. You realize "... not everyone may want ..." to socialize at a bar? Some just go to drink.
- crazypyro 10y agoI would hypothesize that wanting shopping to be focused on convenience over the social aspect is a much more common opinion (see: online shopping) than wanting to go to a loud, crowdy, noisy environment where you can pay a premium to drink alcohol and not be social. I don't think that is a fair comparison at all. Somethings are inherently social, like going to a bar, where as others are much more of a grey area. I would argue that many of these have historically been social experiences out of necessity (no automated machines, no online shopping, etc.), not out of the need for social interaction.
- JustSomeNobody 10y agoMy stepfather owned a bar for some decades. It's not quite as social as you would imagine. A great many people go there to drown "around" people, but not necessarily to drown "socially".
- pimlottc 10y agoThis is an excellent point. For thousands of years, the default was every interaction was social. The idea that you should be able to walk into a standardized store and converse with a clerk like they were an automated sales droid is only a fairly recent phenomenon. These faceless, purely functional transactions - they are exception, not the norm.
- pshc 10y agoThe point of a bar is to socialize, or at least have company. Otherwise why not buy a bottle and stay home?
- JustSomeNobody 10y agoSome people don't want to socialize, but just be "around" people. There seems to be a difference. May be the stigma of drinking alone, where one is sometimes considered a drunk if one drinks alone.