Science with this many variables is messy and has error. But as any good scientist knows, errors are there to help us iterate our models to be less wrong. Frthe

Science with this many variables is messy and has error. But as any good scientist knows, errors are there to help us iterate our models to be less wrong. Frthermore, our computers are literally thousands (^more) of times faster than in 1990, and computational modelling science has improved exponentially as well. Therefore to complain that science wasn't as good in 1990 is merely descriptive, and a good thing. You're assuming everything is static, and should be error-free predictable. That's really not how epistemology works.