Again, I was arguing that the company doesn't need to exist. They showed the public a new use of information technologies and executed their expansion admirably

Again, I was arguing that the company doesn't need to exist. They showed the public a new use of information technologies and executed their expansion admirably. However, since saturation of the initial (rich/western) target population they have been steadily removing value from the platform that got people excited. Why should they be assured of revenue if their business is bait and switch? [edit: typing is hard]