4 ms·
@WhitneyLand Sorry for insulting you with the truth lol! The specific thing I am talking about is not based on supernatural concepts, as @DougN7 said, turns ou
by amriksohata 10y ago
@WhitneyLand Sorry for insulting you with the truth lol!
The specific thing I am talking about is not based on supernatural concepts, as @DougN7 said, turns out half the Science that comes out has to be revised when they realise its not true.
There was a time when Scientists said in the 60s that smoking was good for you, then there were the Harvard Scientists that were bought out to say that sugar has no effect on our weight. Now tell me, if such great scientists can get it wrong, how can you be insulted?
Comparing ideas that great scientists read up on as fiction is insulting to both their theories and you're only fooling people.
- WhitneyLand 10y ago>thing I am talking about is not based on supernatural concepts Please cite evidence that Hindu cosmology is falsifiable. If it's not falsifiable it's supernatural. Science doesn't always have to be right, it just has to be willing to be proven wrong. That's how it's supposed to work. >that great scientists read up on as fiction is insulting Read a little history, this happens all the time.
- amriksohata 10y ago"Science doesn't always have to be right, it just has to be willing to be proven wrong. That's how it's supposed to work." That my friend is the ultimate cop out clause, its like saying "oh we can bash religion for when its wrong but you cant bash science".