4 ms·
FWIW, right or wrong the United States takes the position that a wide variety of its laws apply outside of the territorial boundaries of the United Sates.[1] (A
by nkw 10y ago
FWIW, right or wrong the United States takes the position that a wide variety of its laws apply outside of the territorial boundaries of the United Sates.[1] (And in practice their interpretation is much broader than the Wikipedia article suggests.) How motivated they are to enforce such laws outside of the United States, however varies from case to case. e.g. Edward Snowden, Marc Rich[2], however cf. Manuel Noriega[3], Ahmed Abu Khattala[4] or generally[5]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction#Federal_Law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction#...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega
[4] https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-captured-benghazi-suspect-in-secret-raid/2014/06/17/7ef8746e-f5cf-11e3-a3a5-42be35962a52_story.html?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-ca...
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition
- Taniwha 10y agoIt's one thing to say that laws in the US apply to what US residents do outside the US, it's quite another to pretend that a US law overrides laws in sovereign nations. Of course they can't, FBI Hackers are likely liable to arrest and/or extradition if caught, while it's possible that the US might abrogate its extradition treaties in this case, suspects may find themselves arrested by 3rd countries the moment the leave US borders, or, depending on the country even tried in absentia