3 ms·
Haha. But is it? I'm having a very hard time reading this on a phone. The text is too small and when I zoom in (unlike on desktop) it doesn't reflow. I don't u
by nothrabannosir 10y ago
Haha. But is it? I'm having a very hard time reading this on a phone. The text is too small and when I zoom in (unlike on desktop) it doesn't reflow.
I don't understand this "no css is best css" trope.. this is unusable on mobile.
(Explicit note of the obvious which should go without saying: not a criticism of the page. Just about this HN meme of revering css-less pages. )
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- TeMPOraL 10y agoAt least you get to zoom in, which is not true with most of the mobile websites these days.
- erinyong 10y agoI agree!
- leeoniya 10y agoYou can add an html meta tag that would solve the mobile issues you're describing, without CSS. <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
- LeoPanthera 10y agoIf you set initial-scale=1, isn't width=device-width redundant?
- leeoniya 10y agoit's probably there cause some early implementation somewhere tried to be "smart" if you weren't explicit. too lazy to give you definitive answer, but: [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/css-device-adapt-1/ https://www.w3.org/TR/css-device-adapt-1/ [2] https://benfrain.com/understanding-the-viewport-meta-tag-and-css-viewport/ https://benfrain.com/understanding-the-viewport-meta-tag-and...