Well I suppose that extremism is in the eye of the beholder. The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution: "The right of the people to be secure in their perso

Well I suppose that extremism is in the eye of the beholder. The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." I would argue that the ability of the US government to have unfettered access to all of your electronic devices - even in cases where there is no indication that you have perpetrated any crime - would constitute an "unreasonable search". To you that may be an extremist view. To me that's a reasonable interpretation of the English language.