5 ms·
"[...] the FBI can now legally hack [...], and even overseas, [...]" I don't think that's really true. If for instance a FBI agent hacks into a computer locate
by cesarb 10y ago
"[...] the FBI can now legally hack [...], and even overseas, [...]"
I don't think that's really true. If for instance a FBI agent hacks into a computer located in Brazil and owned by a Brazilian citizen, he is still breaking Brazilian law, no matter what a USA judge says.
- kakarot 10y agoYeah and they wouldn't dare do something like that, just ask Kim Dotcom
- Spooky23 10y agoThe Brazilian court won't get any cooperation from US authorities, so good luck identifying and prosecuting the FBI employees in question.
- themihai 10y agoThe point is that if it's legal in the US the agent will never be extradited. Actually its identity will never be disclosed to the Brazilian authorities. Most likely the US will deny it all.
- sintaxi 10y agoI think this depends entirely on the Extradition Treaty with said country and what offence has been made. Just because what you are doing is legal in you own country does not mean you are necessarily protected from extradition if you break a law in another.
- rbanffy 10y agoI don't think it's a change.
- sioadfjafsdaf 10y agoThe point is that this is an intentionally misleading title and story. This fake news stuff is out of control.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- halomru 10y agoThe US won't extradite them, but that only helps while they stay in US ground. Their vacation choices are far more limited, and visiting Black Hat or the Chaos Communication Congress is out of the question.
- freeone3000 10y agoSo if they hack the Brazilian government, they're punished with poor vacation options? This is proportional?
- themihai 10y agoIt's unlikely for foreign governments to identify FBI individuals. Until the recent leaks "nobody" complained about NSA hacks let alone individual NSA agents. What makes you think it will be different when FBI leads the hacks?
- dzidol 10y agoI wouldn't use word "legally" here, but rather "without worrying about consequences for its employees". First off, it's still illegal in the foreign countries, secondly US claims for its jurisdiction worldwide is not respected by that world itself and such actions may cause some diplomatic consequences which cannot be explained by US' local regulations.