4 ms·
> I'd be annoyed if my mobile bandwidth was getting eaten up by a obvious problem. When you view in a mobile context it does a download of much smaller videos
by BinaryIdiot 10y ago
> I'd be annoyed if my mobile bandwidth was getting eaten up by a obvious problem.
When you view in a mobile context it does a download of much smaller videos and only once. It works differently for mobile and requires you to trigger playback.
> A simple problem with the website says something about the company, not the tech. It is a minor thing but perhaps means something.
So email them and maybe they'll fix it? Unless you'd rather continue using it as a yard stick of dubious value.
> I'd be inclined to give ML most of a break, but a tech company that has problems with its marketing side, especially when marketing something like ML is so crucial... what percentage of their initial customers is going to be people in tech? Gamers? Who do notice these sorts of details?
You're putting way too much stock into such trivial things. Unless you're specifically looking for an issue you're not going to find this. The amount of people who would find an issue like this are on the edge of edge cases.
You seem to have an axe to grind against the company.
- dfraser992 10y ago>You seem to have an axe to grind against the company. No, I said I'd be inclined to give ML a break. I don't have an opinion about ML other than I'm tired of hearing about them. I'm not the parent commenter. The main point I was trying to make was that credibility is assessed by people in different ways depending on their expertise / knowledge base / etc. So someone knowledgeable about websites would notice such a thing and the average person wouldn't. So arguing over whether something is an absolute signifier of credibility or not is sort of pointless.