2 ms·

I find your usage of the word static ambiguous. Also Julia is more static than you might expect, and besides it's still a compiled language, it just has a `dyna

I find your usage of the word static ambiguous. Also Julia is more static than you might expect, and besides it's still a compiled language, it just has a `dynamic` type (ala C# for example) as it's default type. It seems dynamic - like most lisps do - because it supports recompiling a function in a running session (however it doesn't change already compiled code, so not that dynamic).

m0th87 10y ago
Yeah, Julia and lisps demand more nuance than static or dynamic labels. This goes into the details for Julia: http://stackoverflow.com/a/28096079 http://stackoverflow.com/a/28096079 Compilation strategy and code hotswapping are independent of static vs dynamic types. Java is statically typed, however its implementations support interpreted execution and code hotswapping.