16 ms·
This another "article" that's really just rewriting someone else's blog post. There was already a HN discussion based on a link to the original Naked Capitalis
by qwrusz 10y ago
This another "article" that's really just rewriting someone else's blog post.
There was already a HN discussion based on a link to the original Naked Capitalism blog post about Uber: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13079023 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13079023
With that said, the actual financial analysis of Uber's numbers in the writeup is so amateurish and frankly incorrect that I can't recommend anyone waste time reading it. I'm not trying to defend Uber's valuation, but this person's math is just wrong. Also the data is stale, just not worth it.
- briffle 10y agoSome examples of how it's math is incorrect?