You seem to be focusing on the word "opposite" which I think was used in quite a reasonable way here, even if not technically accurate. Does that actually chang

You seem to be focusing on the word "opposite" which I think was used in quite a reasonable way here, even if not technically accurate. Does that actually change the validity of his complaint? That fabricated data was published in the IPCC report, and later nobody was able to show that it was true? Perhaps it may turn out to be true oneday, but the meat of the problem is that it was published without evidence. Then compounded by the fact that somebody looking for evidence failed to find it.