2 ms·
> for all meats, even fish, the ratio is above 1 (it takes more food than is produced) That seems like basic physics(?) How could it possibly be below 1 for an
by ssalazar 10y ago
> for all meats, even fish, the ratio is above 1 (it takes more food than is produced)
That seems like basic physics(?) How could it possibly be below 1 for anything that doesn't photosynthesize?
- peller 10y agoYea. The reason I called out fish is that they have the advantage of more-or-less not needing to support their own body weight to move around, unlike land-based animals, and therefore they have the closest ratio to 1.